netdev - [PATCH] net/core: Replace offensive comment in skbuff.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250828084253.1719646-1-m13940358460@163.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:42:53 +0800
From: mysteryli <m13940358460@....com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
	Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>,
	Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>,
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	“mystery” <929916200@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] net/core: Replace offensive comment in skbuff.c

From: “mystery” <929916200@...com>

The original comment contained profanity to express the frustration of
dealing with a complex and resource-constrained code path. While the
sentiment is understandable, the language is unprofessional and
unnecessary.
Replace it with a more neutral and descriptive comment that maintains
the original technical context and conveys the difficulty of the
situation without the use of offensive language.

Signed-off-by: “mystery” <929916200@...com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index ee0274417948..202c25a01f22 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5333,7 +5333,7 @@ int skb_cow_data(struct sk_buff *skb, int tailbits, struct sk_buff **trailer)
 		    skb_has_frag_list(skb1)) {
 			struct sk_buff *skb2;
 
-			/* Fuck, we are miserable poor guys... */
+			/* This is a painfully difficult situation with limited resources... */
 			if (ntail == 0)
 				skb2 = skb_copy(skb1, GFP_ATOMIC);
 			else
-- 
2.25.1