lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18f621e2-93dd-4153-8c37-f219deb4206d@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:53:26 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
 Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: when to cancel kevents in usbnet

Hi,

I am looking at how kevents are handled. However, recent fiascos
I am reluctant to touch this area. Nevertheless, right now we are
cancelling all deferred kevents upon stop() being called.
It seems to me that that is correct with one exception.
If the deferred kevent is the need to clear a halt, we cannot
just drop that. The only reason we should do so is disconnect().
What do you think? Does this need to be split?

	Regards
		Oliver


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ