[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18f621e2-93dd-4153-8c37-f219deb4206d@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:53:26 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: when to cancel kevents in usbnet
Hi,
I am looking at how kevents are handled. However, recent fiascos
I am reluctant to touch this area. Nevertheless, right now we are
cancelling all deferred kevents upon stop() being called.
It seems to me that that is correct with one exception.
If the deferred kevent is the need to clear a halt, we cannot
just drop that. The only reason we should do so is disconnect().
What do you think? Does this need to be split?
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists