netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/5] Add driver for 1Gbe network chips from MUCSE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37a7ce7d-f34b-4734-8c05-722f6d369193@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 12:17:54 +0530
From: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
To: Yibo Dong <dong100@...se.com>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <horms@...nel.org>,
        <corbet@....net>, <gur.stavi@...wei.com>, <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <lee@...ger.us>, <gongfan1@...wei.com>,
        <lorenzo@...nel.org>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>, <lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com>,
        <alexanderduyck@...com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>, <kees@...nel.org>,
        <gustavoars@...nel.org>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/5] Add driver for 1Gbe network chips from
 MUCSE



On 28/08/25 11:06 am, Yibo Dong wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 10:52:21AM +0530, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> Hi Dong Yibo,
>>
>> On 28/08/25 8:25 am, Dong Yibo wrote:
>>> Hi maintainers,
>>>
>>> This patch series is v9 to introduce support for MUCSE N500/N210 1Gbps
>>> Ethernet controllers. I divide codes into multiple series, this is the
>>> first one which only register netdev without true tx/rx functions.
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>> v8 -> v9:
>>> 1. update function description format '@...urn' to 'Return' 
>>> 2. update 'negative on failure' to 'negative errno on failure'
>>>
>>> links:
>>> v8: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250827034509.501980-1-dong100@mucse.com/
>>> v7: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250822023453.1910972-1-dong100@mucse.com
>>> v6: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250820092154.1643120-1-dong100@mucse.com/
>>> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250818112856.1446278-1-dong100@mucse.com/
>>> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250814073855.1060601-1-dong100@mucse.com/
>>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250812093937.882045-1-dong100@mucse.com/
>>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250721113238.18615-1-dong100@mucse.com/
>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250703014859.210110-1-dong100@mucse.com/
>>
>> Please wait for at least 24 hours before posting a new version. You
>> posted v8 yesterday and most folks won't have noticed v8 by now or they
>> maybe looking to give comments on v8. But before they could do that you
>> posted v9.
>>
>> Keep good amount of gaps between the series so that more folks can look
>> at it. 24 hours is the minimum.
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Danish
>>
>>
> 
> Got it, I found the v8 pathes state in websit:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
> It is 'Changes Requested'. 
> I mistakenly thought that a new version needed to be sent. I will wait

That's correct. 'Changes Requested' means that version will no longer be
accepted and you have to send a newer one. But that doesn't mean you
have to send it immediately.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.1/process/maintainer-netdev.html#i-have-received-review-feedback-when-should-i-post-a-revised-version-of-the-patches


> more time in the next time.
> 
> Thanks for you feedback.

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Danish