lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <009a01dc1a4b$45452120$cfcf6360$@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 09:45:46 +0200
From: <markus.stockhausen@....de>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>,
	<hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	<linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <jan@....eu>,
	"'Chris Packham'" <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: C22/C45 decision in phy_restart_aneg()

Hi,

@Russell: Sorry for the inconvenience of my first mail. After a lengthy
analysis session, I focused too much on the initial C45 enhancement 
of the below function that you wrote. I sent it off too hastily.

So, once again, here is some interesting finding regarding the 
limitations of the Realtek MDIO driver. Remember that it can only run 
in either C22 or C45. This time it is about autonegotiation restart.

int phy_restart_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev) {
  int ret;

  if (phydev->is_c45 && !(phydev->c45_ids.devices_in_package & BIT(0))
    ret = genphy_c45_restart_aneg(phydev);
  else
    ret = genphy_restart_aneg(phydev);

  return ret;
}

I assume that BIT(0) means MDIO_DEVS_C22_PRESENT. As I understand it,
this basically uses C22 commands for C45 PHYs if C22 support is detected.
Currently, I have no reasonable explanation for this additional check.
 
In our case, this function fails for C45 PHYs because the bus and PHY are 
locked down to this single mode. It's stupid, of course, but that's how 
it is. I see two options for fixing the issue:

1) Mask the C22 presence in the bus for all PHYs when running in C45.
2) Drop the C22 condition check in the above function.

Any advice?

Thanks in advance.

Markus


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ