lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PAXPR07MB7984B32F3B306334EE2B8C36A306A@PAXPR07MB7984.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 12:23:48 +0000
From: "Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia)" <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
CC: "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
	"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>, "dsahern@...nel.org"
	<dsahern@...nel.org>, "kuniyu@...zon.com" <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "stephen@...workplumber.org"
	<stephen@...workplumber.org>, "xiyou.wangcong@...il.com"
	<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
	<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "donald.hunter@...il.com" <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
	"ast@...erby.net" <ast@...erby.net>, "liuhangbin@...il.com"
	<liuhangbin@...il.com>, "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ij@...nel.org" <ij@...nel.org>, "Koen De Schepper (Nokia)"
	<koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>, "g.white@...lelabs.com"
	<g.white@...lelabs.com>, "ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com"
	<ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com>, "mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com"
	<mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com>, "cheshire@...le.com" <cheshire@...le.com>,
	"rs.ietf@....at" <rs.ietf@....at>, "Jason_Livingood@...cast.com"
	<Jason_Livingood@...cast.com>, "vidhi_goel@...le.com" <vidhi_goel@...le.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v15 net-next 10/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN option

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 7:46 PM
> To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>; Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> Cc: pabeni@...hat.com; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; corbet@....net; horms@...nel.org; dsahern@...nel.org; kuniyu@...zon.com; bpf@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; jhs@...atatu.com; kuba@...nel.org; stephen@...workplumber.org; xiyou.wangcong@...il.com; jiri@...nulli.us; davem@...emloft.net; andrew+netdev@...n.ch; donald.hunter@...il.com; ast@...erby.net; liuhangbin@...il.com; shuah@...nel.org; linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org; ij@...nel.org; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>; g.white@...lelabs.com; ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com; mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com; cheshire@...le.com; rs.ietf@....at; Jason_Livingood@...cast.com; vidhi_goel@...le.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 net-next 10/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN option
> 
> 
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 7:58 AM Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 2:30 PM
> > > To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
> > > Cc: pabeni@...hat.com; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; corbet@....net; 
> > > horms@...nel.org; dsahern@...nel.org; kuniyu@...zon.com; 
> > > bpf@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; dave.taht@...il.com; 
> > > jhs@...atatu.com; kuba@...nel.org; stephen@...workplumber.org; 
> > > xiyou.wangcong@...il.com; jiri@...nulli.us; davem@...emloft.net; 
> > > andrew+netdev@...n.ch; donald.hunter@...il.com; ast@...erby.net; 
> > > liuhangbin@...il.com; shuah@...nel.org; 
> > > linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org; ij@...nel.org; 
> > > ncardwell@...gle.com; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) 
> > > <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>; g.white@...lelabs.com; 
> > > ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com; mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com; 
> > > cheshire@...le.com; rs.ietf@....at; Jason_Livingood@...cast.com; 
> > > vidhi_goel@...le.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 net-next 10/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN option
> > >
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 1:40 AM <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >  /* Used for make_synack to form the ACE flags */ diff --git 
> > > > a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h index 
> > > > bdac8c42fa82..53e0e85b52be 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> > > > @@ -316,6 +316,13 @@ struct tcp_info {
> > > >                                          * in milliseconds, including any
> > > >                                          * unfinished recovery.
> > > >                                          */
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_ce;    /* # of CE marks received */
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_delivered_e1_bytes;  /* Accurate ECN byte counters */
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_delivered_e0_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_delivered_ce_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_e1_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_e0_bytes;
> > > > +       __u32   tcpi_received_ce_bytes;
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > >
> > > We do not add more fields to tcp_info, unless added fields are a multiple of 64 bits.
> > >
> > > Otherwise a hole is added and can not be recovered.
> >
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > Then, would it make sense to add __u32 reserved; here or this is not an option?
> >
> 
> I would prefer we take the opportunity to export a 32bit field right there, instead of a hole.
> 
> A reserved field makes it difficult for ss commands to know if a new kernel is using it for a different purpose.
> 
> Neal, any idea of what would be useful ?
> 
> I was thinking lately of sk_err_soft, but I am not yet convinced.

Hi Eric,

I have not heard anything from Neal.

Do you think other fields can be exported to this 32-bit field?

Another way is to increase them from u32 to u64.

Chia-Yu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ