[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLbj1IjZ1Lb37rYu@strlen.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:32:20 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 nf-next 0/3] flow offload teardown when layer 2 roaming
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com> wrote:
> > Changes in v3:
> > - static nf_flow_table_switchdev_nb.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Unchanged, only tags RFC net-next to PATCH nf-next.
> >
> > Eric Woudstra (3):
> > netfilter: flow: Add bridge_vid member
> > netfilter: nf_flow_table_core: teardown direct xmit when destination
> > changed
> > netfilter: nf_flow_table_ip: don't follow fastpath when marked
> > teardown
> >
> > include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h | 2 +
> > net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c | 6 +++
> > net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c | 3 ++
> > 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >
>
> What is the status of this patch-set? Is it still being considered to be
> applied? Should I re-submit it? Anything I can do, please let me know.
Its marked as 'Changes Requested' in patchwork but I see no feedback
on patchwork or lore archives.
Pablo, do you have any objections to this patchset?
AFAICS this is ok and I'd apply this patchset.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists