netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 nf-next 0/3] flow offload teardown when layer 2 roaming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aLbj1IjZ1Lb37rYu@strlen.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:32:20 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 nf-next 0/3] flow offload teardown when layer 2 roaming

Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com> wrote:
> > Changes in v3:
> > - static nf_flow_table_switchdev_nb.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Unchanged, only tags RFC net-next to PATCH nf-next.
> > 
> > Eric Woudstra (3):
> >   netfilter: flow: Add bridge_vid member
> >   netfilter: nf_flow_table_core: teardown direct xmit when destination
> >     changed
> >   netfilter: nf_flow_table_ip: don't follow fastpath when marked
> >     teardown
> > 
> >  include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h |  2 +
> >  net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c    | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c      |  6 +++
> >  net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c      |  3 ++
> >  4 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > 
> 
> What is the status of this patch-set? Is it still being considered to be
> applied? Should I re-submit it? Anything I can do, please let me know.

Its marked as 'Changes Requested' in patchwork but I see no feedback
on patchwork or lore archives.

Pablo, do you have any objections to this patchset?

AFAICS this is ok and I'd apply this patchset.