[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <IA3PR11MB898620E835A7700451F0ADA1E501A@IA3PR11MB8986.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 09:15:29 +0000
From: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
To: Brahmajit Das <listout@...tout.xyz>
CC: "vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev" <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] net: intel: fm10k: Fix parameter idx
set but not used
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brahmajit Das <listout@...tout.xyz>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:11 AM
> To: Loktionov, Aleksandr <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> Cc: vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev; andrew+netdev@...n.ch; Nguyen, Anthony
> L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; davem@...emloft.net; intel-wired-
> lan@...ts.osuosl.org; kuba@...nel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] net: intel: fm10k: Fix
> parameter idx set but not used
>
> On 03.09.2025 06:08, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On
> Behalf
> > > Of Brahmajit Das
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 9:24 AM
> > > To: vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
> > > Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch; Nguyen, Anthony L
> > > <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; davem@...emloft.net; intel-wired-
> > > lan@...ts.osuosl.org; kuba@...nel.org; listout@...tout.xyz;
> > > netdev@...r.kernel.org; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> > > <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] net: intel: fm10k: Fix
> > > parameter idx set but not used
> > >
> > > Variable idx is set in the loop, but is never used resulting in
> dead
> > > code. Building with GCC 16, which enables
> > > -Werror=unused-but-set-parameter= by default results in build
> error.
> > > This patch removes the idx parameter, since all the callers of the
> > > fm10k_unbind_hw_stats_q as 0 as idx anyways.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
> > > Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <listout@...tout.xyz>
> > > ---
> > > changes in v2:
> > > - Removed the idx parameter, since all callers of
> > > fm10k_unbind_hw_stats_q passes idx as 0 anyways.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_common.c | 5 ++---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_common.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pf.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_vf.c | 2 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_common.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_common.c
> > > index f51a63fca513..1f919a50c765 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_common.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_common.c
> > > @@ -447,17 +447,16 @@ void fm10k_update_hw_stats_q(struct fm10k_hw
> > > *hw, struct fm10k_hw_stats_q *q,
> > > /**
> > > * fm10k_unbind_hw_stats_q - Unbind the queue counters from
> their
> > > queues
> > > * @q: pointer to the ring of hardware statistics queue
> > > - * @idx: index pointing to the start of the ring iteration
> > > * @count: number of queues to iterate over
> > > *
> > > * Function invalidates the index values for the queues so any
> > > updates that
> > > * may have happened are ignored and the base for the queue
> stats
> > > is reset.
> > > **/
> > The kernel-doc comment still mentions @idx.
> > Everything else if fine.
> > Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> >
> >
> Hi Aleksandr, can you please point out how I can remove the kernel-doc
> comment. I thought removing the line
> @idx: index pointing to the start of the ring iteration from
> fm10k_common.c would do that.
>
Sorry, my mistake, I overlooked '-' !
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> I'm open to sending in a v3 with any changes required.
> > > -void fm10k_unbind_hw_stats_q(struct fm10k_hw_stats_q *q, u32 idx,
> > > u32
> > > count)
> > > +void fm10k_unbind_hw_stats_q(struct fm10k_hw_stats_q *q, u32
> count)
> > > {
> > > u32 i;
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < count; i++, idx++, q++) {
> > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++, q++) {
> > > q->rx_stats_idx = 0;
> > > q->tx_stats_idx = 0;
> > > }
> >
> > ...
>
> --
> Regards,
> listout
Powered by blists - more mailing lists