[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+BBuYYk1n=4HvEiZS6YhMwjdntt=psvAEAzXwcU-VKkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 03:01:54 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@...e.fr>, Takamitsu Iwai <takamitz@...zon.co.jp>
Cc: linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [ROSE] slab-use-after-free in lock_timer_base
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 2:51 AM Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux@...e.fr> wrote:
>
> On 6.16.4 kernel patched with last ROSE commit for refcount use
> rose_remove_node() is causing refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free
>
> List: linux-stable-commits
> Subject: Patch "net: rose: split remove and free operations in
> rose_remove_neigh()" has been added to the 6.1
> From: Sasha Levin <sashal () kernel ! org>
> Date: 2025-08-30 20:20:24
> Message-ID: 20250830202024.2485006-1-sashal () kernel ! org
>
> Bernard Pidoux
> F6BVP / AI7BG
Any particular reason you do not CC the author ?
CC Takamitsu Iwai <takamitz@...zon.co.jp>
BTW, a syzbot report was already sent to the list.
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7287222a6d88bdb559a7
Powered by blists - more mailing lists