[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f95b34b6-2c58-4263-bc4f-cc604e928c66@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 20:56:26 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: stmmac: mdio: provide
stmmac_mdio_wait()
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 01:11:05PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> All the readl_poll_timeout()s follow the same pattern - test a register
> for a bit being clear every 100us, and timeout after 10ms returning
> -EBUSY. Wrap this up into a function to avoid duplicating this.
>
> This slightly changes the return value for stmmac_mdio_write() if the
> second readl_poll_timeout() fails - rather than returning -ETIMEDOUT
> we return -EBUSY matching the stmmac_mdio_read() behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists