[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68bb4a47.a00a0220.eb3d.001a.GAE@google.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 13:38:31 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+7e0f89fb6cae5d002de0@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, stfomichev@...il.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in __netdev_update_features
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit: d69eb204c255 Merge tag 'net-6.17-rc5' of git://git.kernel...
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13a2f162580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9c302bcfb26a48af
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7e0f89fb6cae5d002de0
compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12942962580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16942962580000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d2a8d25d4378/disk-d69eb204.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4574714ede3c/vmlinux-d69eb204.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e5bae1ec81fb/bzImage-d69eb204.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7e0f89fb6cae5d002de0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz.0.17'.
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: entered promiscuous mode
macsec1: entered allmulticast mode
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: entered allmulticast mode
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz.0.17/6023 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_sync_lower_features net/core/dev.c:10649 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __netdev_update_features+0xcb1/0x1be0 net/core/dev.c:10819
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3235 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x716/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3502
and the lock comparison function returns 0:
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#20);
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#20);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
2 locks held by syz.0.17/6023:
#0: ffffffff8f539288 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x1d0/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3501
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3235 [inline]
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x716/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3502
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6023 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_deadlock_bug+0x28b/0x2a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3041
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3093 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1a3f/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3895
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760
netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
netdev_sync_lower_features net/core/dev.c:10649 [inline]
__netdev_update_features+0xcb1/0x1be0 net/core/dev.c:10819
netdev_update_features+0x6d/0xe0 net/core/dev.c:10876
macsec_notify+0x2f5/0x660 drivers/net/macsec.c:4533
notifier_call_chain+0x1b3/0x3e0 kernel/notifier.c:85
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2267 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2281 [inline]
netdev_features_change+0x85/0xc0 net/core/dev.c:1570
__dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3469 [inline]
dev_ethtool+0x1536/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3502
dev_ioctl+0x392/0x1150 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:759
sock_do_ioctl+0x22c/0x300 net/socket.c:1252
sock_ioctl+0x576/0x790 net/socket.c:1359
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:598 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:584
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f08c1f8ebe9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff0a699878 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f08c21c5fa0 RCX: 00007f08c1f8ebe9
RDX: 0000200000000080 RSI: 0000000000008946 RDI: 0000000000000006
RBP: 00007f08c2011e19 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f08c21c5fa0 R14: 00007f08c21c5fa0 R15: 0000000000000003
</TASK>
---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists