[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250908131917.10785ce0@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:19:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Gal Pressman
<gal@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Cosmin Ratiu
<cratiu@...dia.com>, Nimrod Oren <noren@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch
<mbloch@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: drv-net: Relax total BW check in
devlink_rate_tc_bw.py
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 22:16:29 +0300 Carolina Jubran wrote:
> However, I’ll also need to extend load.py:
>
> 1. Binding support to ensure traffic flows through the specific VLAN
> interface.
> 2. Interval-based measurement for iperf3 --json to analyze only the
> stable period.
>
> So my plan is:
>
> 1. Send v2 for net to fix the current test with interval-based
> measurement.
> 2. Follow up with a patch to extend load.py with reverse/binding/interval
> support and then migrate the test to use it.
>
> Does that sound good to you?
Sounds too complicated, this is just a stability improvement for a test
which works on single device, and is not exercised / reported upstream.
Let's jump straight to step 2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists