netdev - [PATCH 6/9] net: stmmac: qcom-ethqos: split power management fields into a separate structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250910-qcom-sa8255p-emac-v1-6-32a79cf1e668@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:07:43 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, 
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, 
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, 
 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, 
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] net: stmmac: qcom-ethqos: split power management
 fields into a separate structure

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>

Now that we have a separate wrapper for device match data, let's extend
this structure with a pointer to the structure containing fields related
to power-management only. This is done because a device may have the
same device settings but different power management mode (e.g.: firmware
vs manual).

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
---
 .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c   | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c
index dcee5c161c01124ea6bf36ceaeca4cc8ca29c5d5..d4ddf1c5c1bca2ae1fc5ec38a4ac244e1677482e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c
@@ -95,15 +95,19 @@ struct ethqos_emac_driver_data {
 	unsigned int num_por;
 	bool rgmii_config_loopback_en;
 	bool has_emac_ge_3;
-	const char *link_clk_name;
 	bool has_integrated_pcs;
 	u32 dma_addr_width;
 	struct dwmac4_addrs dwmac4_addrs;
 	bool needs_sgmii_loopback;
 };

+struct ethqos_emac_pm_data {
+	const char *link_clk_name;
+};
+
 struct ethqos_emac_match_data {
 	const struct ethqos_emac_driver_data *drv_data;
+	const struct ethqos_emac_pm_data *pm_data;
 };

 struct qcom_ethqos {
@@ -297,7 +301,6 @@ static const struct ethqos_emac_driver_data emac_v4_0_0_data = {
 	.num_por = ARRAY_SIZE(emac_v4_0_0_por),
 	.rgmii_config_loopback_en = false,
 	.has_emac_ge_3 = true,
-	.link_clk_name = "phyaux",
 	.has_integrated_pcs = true,
 	.needs_sgmii_loopback = true,
 	.dma_addr_width = 36,
@@ -319,8 +322,13 @@ static const struct ethqos_emac_driver_data emac_v4_0_0_data = {
 	},
 };

+static const struct ethqos_emac_pm_data emac_sa8775p_pm_data = {
+	.link_clk_name = "phyaux",
+};
+
 static const struct ethqos_emac_match_data emac_sa8775p_data = {
 	.drv_data = &emac_v4_0_0_data,
+	.pm_data = &emac_sa8775p_pm_data,
 };

 static int ethqos_dll_configure(struct qcom_ethqos *ethqos)
@@ -787,11 +795,13 @@ static void ethqos_ptp_clk_freq_config(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
 static int qcom_ethqos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct ethqos_emac_driver_data *drv_data;
+	const struct ethqos_emac_pm_data *pm_data;
 	const struct ethqos_emac_match_data *data;
 	struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat;
 	struct stmmac_resources stmmac_res;
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct qcom_ethqos *ethqos;
+	const char *clk_name;
 	int ret, i;

 	ret = stmmac_get_platform_resources(pdev, &stmmac_res);
@@ -839,6 +849,9 @@ static int qcom_ethqos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

 	data = device_get_match_data(dev);
 	drv_data = data->drv_data;
+	pm_data = data->pm_data;
+	clk_name = pm_data && pm_data->link_clk_name ?
+				pm_data->link_clk_name : "rgmii";

 	ethqos->por = drv_data->por;
 	ethqos->num_por = drv_data->num_por;
@@ -846,7 +859,7 @@ static int qcom_ethqos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ethqos->has_emac_ge_3 = drv_data->has_emac_ge_3;
 	ethqos->needs_sgmii_loopback = drv_data->needs_sgmii_loopback;

-	ethqos->link_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, drv_data->link_clk_name ?: "rgmii");
+	ethqos->link_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, clk_name);
 	if (IS_ERR(ethqos->link_clk))
 		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ethqos->link_clk),
 				     "Failed to get link_clk\n");

-- 
2.48.1