[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0qmb9ne.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 17:38:13 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marek Vasut
<marex@...x.de>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Pascal
Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: configure strap pins
during reset
Hello bastien,
> +static int ksz_configure_strap(struct ksz_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pinctrl_state *state = NULL;
> + struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->dev->of_node, "microchip,ksz8463")) {
> + struct gpio_desc *rxd0;
> + struct gpio_desc *rxd1;
> +
> + rxd0 = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev->dev, "strap", 0, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(rxd0))
> + return PTR_ERR(rxd0);
> +
> + rxd1 = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev->dev, "strap", 1, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + if (IS_ERR(rxd1))
> + return PTR_ERR(rxd1);
> +
> + /* If at least one strap definition is missing we don't do anything */
> + if (!rxd0 || !rxd1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(dev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(pinctrl))
> + return PTR_ERR(pinctrl);
> +
> + state = pinctrl_lookup_state(pinctrl, "reset");
> + if (IS_ERR(state))
> + return PTR_ERR(state);
> +
> + ret = pinctrl_select_state(pinctrl, state);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
In order to simplify the pinctrl handling I would propose to replace
these three function calls by:
devm_pinctrl_get_select(dev->dev, "reset")
I do not think in this case we actually require the internal
devm_pinctrl_put() calls from the above helper, but they probably do not
hurt either.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists