[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250910170758.GC30363@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:07:58 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Jaakko Karrenpalo <jkarrenpalo@...il.com>,
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net 2/3] hsr: use hsr_for_each_port_rtnl in
hsr_port_get_hsr
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 09:15:32AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> hsr_port_get_hsr() iterates over ports using hsr_for_each_port(),
> but many of its callers do not hold the required RCU lock.
>
> Switch to hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(), since most callers already hold
> the rtnl lock. After review, all callers are covered by either the rtnl
> lock or the RCU lock, except hsr_dev_xmit(). Fix this by adding an
> RCU read lock there.
>
> Fixes: c5a759117210 ("net/hsr: Use list_head (and rcu) instead of array for slave devices.")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Thanks,
I agree with your analysis.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists