[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aqvluk774lxbko2znaeozteef246mcvwd4qhvcqsqahr5zdmyw@kmbefshxxm53>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:41:16 -0700
From: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@...valent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 11/14] bpf: Introduce
BPF_SOCK_OPS_UDP_CONNECTED_CB
> > res = __ip4_datagram_connect(sk, uaddr, addr_len);
> > if (!res)
> > udp4_hash4(sk);
> > + udp_call_bpf(sk, BPF_SOCK_OPS_UDP_CONNECTED_CB);
>
> Why is this called on failure ?
>
> Same for IPv6.
My mistake, it should only be called on success.
if (!res) {
udp4_hash4(sk);
udp_call_bpf(sk, BPF_SOCK_OPS_UDP_CONNECTED_CB);
}
I'll fix this in a later revision.
Jordan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists