netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 net 6/8] tcp: Use sk_dst_dev_rcu() in tcp_fastopen_active_disable_ofo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAVpQUDgfLp3Ca8M0Z-Q1Jf00ufDsJJQCcSASTGBJkKTOGMO9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:24:40 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net 6/8] tcp: Use sk_dst_dev_rcu() in tcp_fastopen_active_disable_ofo_check().

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:07 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 9:53 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Sorry, I missed this one.  I'll drop this patch and send the
> > series to net-next.
> >
>
> No problem.
>
> Main reason for us to use net-next is that adding lockdep can bring new issues,
> thus we have more time to polish patches before hitting more users.
>
> We also can iterate faster, not having to wait one week for net fan in.

Thank you for explaining the reason.  That makes sense.

Then should we keep or drop Fixes: tag ?  At least it will not land
on the mainline and thus stable until the next merge window.