[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250912093331.862333-1-ivecera@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 11:33:31 +0200
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH net] dpll: fix clock quality level reporting
The DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_ITU_OPT1_EPRC is not reported via netlink
due to bug in dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(). The usage of
DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX for both DECLARE_BITMAP() and
for_each_set_bit() is not correct because these macros requires bitmap
size and not the highest valid bit in the bitmap.
Use correct bitmap size to fix this issue.
Fixes: a1afb959add1 ("dpll: add clock quality level attribute and op")
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
---
drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 036f21cac0a9..0a852011653c 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static int
dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX + 1) = { 0 };
const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
- DECLARE_BITMAP(qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX) = { 0 };
enum dpll_clock_quality_level ql;
int ret;
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
ret = ops->clock_quality_level_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), qls, extack);
if (ret)
return ret;
- for_each_set_bit(ql, qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX)
+ for_each_set_bit(ql, qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX + 1)
if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL, ql))
return -EMSGSIZE;
--
2.49.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists