lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250914125949.17ea0ade@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 12:59:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
 Horman <horms@...nel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason
 Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio
 Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Lei Yang
 <leiyang@...hat.com>, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] net: ethtool: add get_rx_ring_count
 callback to optimize RX ring queries

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:59:13 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> @@ -1225,9 +1242,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxrings(struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = ops->get_rxnfc(dev, &info, NULL);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +	info.data = ethtool_get_rx_ring_count(dev);

Is there a reason we're no longer checking for negative errno here?
It's possible that none of the drivers actually return an error, but
we should still check. For consistency with the other patches / paths
if nothing else.

>  	return ethtool_rxnfc_copy_to_user(useraddr, &info, info_size, NULL);
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ