[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916160951.541279-7-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:09:47 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/10] udp: update sk_rmem_alloc before busylock acquisition
Avoid piling too many producers on the busylock
by updating sk_rmem_alloc before busylock acquisition.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index edd846fee90ff7850356a5cb3400ce96856e5429..658ae87827991a78c25c2172d52e772c94ea217f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1753,13 +1753,16 @@ int __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (rmem > (rcvbuf >> 1)) {
skb_condense(skb);
size = skb->truesize;
+ rmem = atomic_add_return(size, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
+ if (rmem > rcvbuf)
+ goto uncharge_drop;
busy = busylock_acquire(sk);
+ } else {
+ atomic_add(size, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
}
udp_set_dev_scratch(skb);
- atomic_add(size, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
-
spin_lock(&list->lock);
err = udp_rmem_schedule(sk, size);
if (err) {
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists