[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916162502.0fcdaf9a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:25:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Konrad Leszczynski
<konrad.leszczynski@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cezary.rojewski@...el.com,
sebastian.basierski@...el.com, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: stmmac: replace memcpy with
ethtool_puts in ethtool
On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 19:12:22 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> where desc can be any length, ironically making
> dwmac5_safety_feat_dump() unsafe. This is why i asked that this be
> changed to be the same stmmac_stats, so [ETH_GSTRING_LEN]
> __nonstring. But that seems to of fallen on deaf ears.
Yes, very strange.
Tony, Przemek, I suspect the folks here are from "different part of
Intel" but I think they need some guidance..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists