lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1407e41e-2750-4594-adaf-77f8d9f8ccf7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:39:40 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
 Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
 Alexei Lazar <alazar@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2 10/11] net/mlx5e: Update and set Xon/Xoff upon port
 speed set



On 15/09/2025 10:38, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/09/2025 17:36, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 17:25:22 +0300 Mark Bloch wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2025 16:47, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 17:00:11 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>>> Hi, this is breaking dual host CX7 w/ 28.45.1300 (but I think most
>>>>> older FW versions, too). Looks like the host is not receiving any
>>>>> mcast (ping within a subnet doesn't work because the host receives
>>>>> no ndisc), and most traffic slows down to a trickle.
>>>>> Lost of rx_prio0_buf_discard increments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please TAL ASAP, this change went to LTS last week.
>>>>
>>>> Any news on this? I heard that it also breaks DCB/QoS configuration
>>>> on 6.12.45 LTS.
>>>
>>> We are looking into this, once we have anything I'll update.
>>> Just to make sure, reverting this is one commit solves the
>>> issue you are seeing?
>>
>> It did for me, but Daniel (who is working on the PSP series)
>> mentioned that he had reverted all three to get net-next working:
>>
>>    net/mlx5e: Set local Xoff after FW update
>>    net/mlx5e: Update and set Xon/Xoff upon port speed set
>>    net/mlx5e: Update and set Xon/Xoff upon MTU set
>>
> 
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> Thanks for reporting.
> We're investigating and will update soon.
> 
> Regards,
> Tariq
> 

Hi,

We prefer reverting the single patch [1] for now. We'll submit a fixed 
version later.

Regarding the other two patches [2], initial testing showed no issues.
Can you/Daniel share more info? What issues you see, and the repro steps.

Thanks,
Tariq

[1]
net/mlx5e: Update and set Xon/Xoff upon port speed set

[2]
net/mlx5e: Set local Xoff after FW update
net/mlx5e: Update and set Xon/Xoff upon MTU set


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ