[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad040233-2196-4d90-9da3-326b637dedd4@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:54:58 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Konrad Leszczynski
<konrad.leszczynski@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<cezary.rojewski@...el.com>, <sebastian.basierski@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: stmmac: replace memcpy with ethtool_puts
in ethtool
On 9/16/2025 4:25 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 19:12:22 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> where desc can be any length, ironically making
>> dwmac5_safety_feat_dump() unsafe. This is why i asked that this be
>> changed to be the same stmmac_stats, so [ETH_GSTRING_LEN]
>> __nonstring. But that seems to of fallen on deaf ears.
>
> Yes, very strange.
>
> Tony, Przemek, I suspect the folks here are from "different part of
> Intel" but I think they need some guidance..
I'll reach out and see if we can provide them some help.
Thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists