[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a706bb87-46e1-4524-8d35-8f22569a73e7@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:38:11 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuni1840@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next/net 6/6] selftest: bpf: Add test for
SK_MEMCG_EXCLUSIVE.
On 9/17/25 12:14 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> The test does the following for IPv4/IPv6 x TCP/UDP sockets
> with/without SK_MEMCG_EXCLUSIVE, which can be turned on by
> net.core.memcg_exclusive or bpf_setsockopt(SK_BPF_MEMCG_EXCLUSIVE).
>
> 1. Create socket pairs
> 2. Send a bunch of data that requires more than 1024 pages
> 3. Read memory_allocated from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated and
> sk->sk_prot->memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc
> 4. Check if unread data is charged to memory_allocated
>
> If SK_MEMCG_EXCLUSIVE is set, memory_allocated should not be
> changed, but we allow a small error (up to 10 pages) in case
> other processes on the host use some amounts of TCP/UDP memory.
>
> The amount of allocated pages are buffered to per-cpu variable
> {tcp,udp}_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc up to +/- net.core.mem_pcpu_rsv
> before reported to {tcp,udp}_memory_allocated.
>
> At 3., memory_allocated is calculated from the 2 variables twice
> at fentry and fexit of socket create function to check if the per-cpu
> value is drained during calculation. In that case, 3. is retried.
>
> We use kern_sync_rcu() for UDP because UDP recv queue is destroyed
> after RCU grace period.
>
> The test takes ~2s on QEMU (64 CPUs) w/ KVM but takes 6s w/o KVM.
>
> # time ./test_progs -t sk_memcg
> #370/1 sk_memcg/TCP :OK
> #370/2 sk_memcg/UDP :OK
> #370/3 sk_memcg/TCPv6:OK
> #370/4 sk_memcg/UDPv6:OK
> #370 sk_memcg:OK
> Summary: 1/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> real 0m1.623s
> user 0m0.165s
> sys 0m0.366s
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
> ---
> v7:
> * Add test for sysctl
>
> v6:
> * Trace sk_prot->memory_allocated + sk_prot->memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc
>
> v5:
> * Use kern_sync_rcu()
> * Double NR_SEND to 128
>
> v4:
> * Only use inet_create() hook
> * Test bpf_getsockopt()
> * Add serial_ prefix
> * Reduce sleep() and the amount of sent data
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_memcg.c | 261 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sk_memcg.c | 146 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 407 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_memcg.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sk_memcg.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_memcg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_memcg.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..777fb81e9365
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_memcg.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright 2025 Google LLC */
> +
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include "sk_memcg.skel.h"
> +#include "network_helpers.h"
> +
> +#define NR_SOCKETS 64
> +#define NR_SEND 128
> +#define BUF_SINGLE 1024
> +#define BUF_TOTAL (BUF_SINGLE * NR_SEND)
> +
> +struct test_case {
> + char name[8];
> + int family;
> + int type;
> + int (*create_sockets)(struct test_case *test_case, int sk[], int len);
> + long (*get_memory_allocated)(struct test_case *test_case, struct sk_memcg *skel);
> +};
> +
> +static int tcp_create_sockets(struct test_case *test_case, int sk[], int len)
> +{
> + int server, i;
> +
> + server = start_server(test_case->family, test_case->type, NULL, 0, 0);
> + ASSERT_GE(server, 0, "start_server_str");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len / 2; i++) {
> + sk[i * 2] = connect_to_fd(server, 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(sk[i * 2], 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> + return sk[i * 2];
> +
> + sk[i * 2 + 1] = accept(server, NULL, NULL);
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(sk[i * 2 + 1], 0, "accept"))
> + return sk[i * 2 + 1];
> + }
> +
> + close(server);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int udp_create_sockets(struct test_case *test_case, int sk[], int len)
> +{
> + int i, err, rcvbuf = BUF_TOTAL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len / 2; i++) {
nit. How about "for (i = 0; i < len; i += 2) {" once here instead of "i * 2"
below. Same for the tcp_create_sockets() above.
> + sk[i * 2] = start_server(test_case->family, test_case->type, NULL, 0, 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(sk[i * 2], 0, "start_server"))
> + return sk[i * 2];
> +
> + sk[i * 2 + 1] = connect_to_fd(sk[i * 2], 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(sk[i * 2 + 1], 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> + return sk[i * 2 + 1];
> +
> + err = connect_fd_to_fd(sk[i * 2], sk[i * 2 + 1], 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "connect_fd_to_fd"))
> + return err;
> +
> + err = setsockopt(sk[i * 2], SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, &rcvbuf, sizeof(int));
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "setsockopt(SO_RCVBUF)"))
> + return err;
> +
> + err = setsockopt(sk[i * 2 + 1], SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, &rcvbuf, sizeof(int));
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "setsockopt(SO_RCVBUF)"))
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long get_memory_allocated(struct test_case *test_case,
> + bool *activated, bool *stable,
> + long *memory_allocated)
> +{
> + *stable = false;
> +
> + do {
> + *activated = true;
> +
> + /* AF_INET and AF_INET6 share the same memory_allocated.
> + * tcp_init_sock() is called by AF_INET and AF_INET6,
> + * but udp_lib_init_sock() is inline.
> + */
> + socket(AF_INET, test_case->type, 0);
fd is leaked.
> + } while (!*stable);
cannot loop forever. The test needs to assume the machine is relatively network
quiet anyway (so serial_). Things can still change after the stable test also. I
think having a way (the fentry in the progs/sk_memcg.c) to account for the
percpu fw alloc is good enough, and this should help if there is some light
background traffic that suddenly flush the hidden +255 percpu counter to the
global one and another percpu counter still has a -254 for example.
> +
> + return *memory_allocated;
> +}
> +
> +static long tcp_get_memory_allocated(struct test_case *test_case, struct sk_memcg *skel)
> +{
> + return get_memory_allocated(test_case,
> + &skel->bss->tcp_activated,
> + &skel->bss->tcp_stable,
> + &skel->bss->tcp_memory_allocated);
> +}
> +
> +static long udp_get_memory_allocated(struct test_case *test_case, struct sk_memcg *skel)
> +{
> + return get_memory_allocated(test_case,
> + &skel->bss->udp_activated,
> + &skel->bss->udp_stable,
> + &skel->bss->udp_memory_allocated);
> +}
> +
> +static int check_exclusive(struct test_case *test_case,
> + struct sk_memcg *skel, bool exclusive)
> +{
> + char buf[BUF_SINGLE] = {};
> + long memory_allocated[2];
> + int sk[NR_SOCKETS] = {};
> + int err, i, j;
> +
> + err = test_case->create_sockets(test_case, sk, ARRAY_SIZE(sk));
> + if (err)
> + goto close;
> +
> + memory_allocated[0] = test_case->get_memory_allocated(test_case, skel);
> +
> + /* allocate pages >= 1024 */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sk); i++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < NR_SEND; j++) {
> + int bytes = send(sk[i], buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
> +
> + /* Avoid too noisy logs when something failed. */
> + if (bytes != sizeof(buf)) {
> + ASSERT_EQ(bytes, sizeof(buf), "send");
> + if (bytes < 0) {
> + err = bytes;
> + goto close;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + memory_allocated[1] = test_case->get_memory_allocated(test_case, skel);
> +
> + if (exclusive)
> + ASSERT_LE(memory_allocated[1], memory_allocated[0] + 10, "exclusive");
> + else
> + ASSERT_GT(memory_allocated[1], memory_allocated[0] + 1024, "not exclusive");The test is taking >10s in my environemnt. Although it has kasan and other dbg
turned on, my environment is not a slow one tbh. The WATCHDOG > 10s warning is
hit pretty often. The exclusive case is expecting +10. May be we just need to
check +128 for non-exclusive which should be subtle enough to contrast with the
exclusive case? With +128, NR_SEND 32 is more than enough?
> +
> +close:
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sk); i++)
> + close(sk[i]);
> +
> + if (test_case->type == SOCK_DGRAM) {
> + /* UDP recv queue is destroyed after RCU grace period.
> + * With one kern_sync_rcu(), memory_allocated[0] of the
> + * isoalted case often matches with memory_allocated[1]
> + * of the preceding non-exclusive case.
> + */
I don't think I understand the double kern_sync_rcu() below.
> + kern_sync_rcu();
> + kern_sync_rcu();> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +void run_test(struct test_case *test_case)
static
> +{
> + struct nstoken *nstoken;
> + struct sk_memcg *skel;
> + int cgroup, err;
> +
> + skel = sk_memcg__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
> + return;
> +
> + skel->bss->nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
> +
> + err = sk_memcg__attach(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach"))
> + goto destroy_skel;
> +
> + cgroup = test__join_cgroup("/sk_memcg");
> + if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup, 0, "join_cgroup"))
> + goto destroy_skel;
> +
> + err = make_netns("sk_memcg");
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "make_netns"))
> + goto close_cgroup;
> +
> + nstoken = open_netns("sk_memcg");
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "open_netns"))
> + goto remove_netns;
> +
> + err = check_exclusive(test_case, skel, false);
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "test_exclusive(false)"))
> + goto close_netns;
> +
> + err = write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/core/memcg_exclusive", "1");
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "write_sysctl(1)"))
> + goto close_netns;
> +
> + err = check_exclusive(test_case, skel, true);
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "test_exclusive(true by sysctl)"))
> + goto close_netns;
> +
> + err = write_sysctl("/proc/sys/net/core/memcg_exclusive", "0");
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "write_sysctl(0)"))
> + goto close_netns;
> +
> + skel->links.sock_create = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.sock_create, cgroup);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.sock_create, "attach_cgroup(sock_create)"))
> + goto close_netns;
> +
> + err = check_exclusive(test_case, skel, true);
> + ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "test_exclusive(true by bpf)");
> +
> +close_netns:
> + close_netns(nstoken);
> +remove_netns:
> + remove_netns("sk_memcg");
> +close_cgroup:
> + close(cgroup);
> +destroy_skel:
> + sk_memcg__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "TCP ",
> + .family = AF_INET,
> + .type = SOCK_STREAM,
> + .create_sockets = tcp_create_sockets,
> + .get_memory_allocated = tcp_get_memory_allocated,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "UDP ",
> + .family = AF_INET,
> + .type = SOCK_DGRAM,
> + .create_sockets = udp_create_sockets,
> + .get_memory_allocated = udp_get_memory_allocated,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "TCPv6",
> + .family = AF_INET6,
> + .type = SOCK_STREAM,
> + .create_sockets = tcp_create_sockets,
> + .get_memory_allocated = tcp_get_memory_allocated,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "UDPv6",
> + .family = AF_INET6,
> + .type = SOCK_DGRAM,
> + .create_sockets = udp_create_sockets,
> + .get_memory_allocated = udp_get_memory_allocated,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +void serial_test_sk_memcg(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases); i++) {
> + test__start_subtest(test_cases[i].name);
This is not doing anything without "if".
> + run_test(&test_cases[i]);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sk_memcg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sk_memcg.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6b1a928a0c90
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sk_memcg.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright 2025 Google LLC */
> +
> +#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +
> +extern int tcp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc __ksym;
> +extern int udp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc __ksym;
> +
> +int nr_cpus;
> +bool tcp_activated, tcp_stable, udp_activated, udp_stable;
> +long tcp_memory_allocated, udp_memory_allocated;
> +static struct sock *tcp_sk_tracing, *udp_sk_tracing;
> +
> +struct sk_prot {
> + long *memory_allocated;
> + int *memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc;
> +};
> +
> +static int drain_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc(__u32 i, struct sk_prot *sk_prot_ctx)
> +{
> + int *memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc;
> +
> + memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc = bpf_per_cpu_ptr(sk_prot_ctx->memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc, i);
> + if (memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc)
> + *sk_prot_ctx->memory_allocated += *memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long get_memory_allocated(struct sock *_sk, int *memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = bpf_core_cast(_sk, struct sock);
> + struct sk_prot sk_prot_ctx;
> + long memory_allocated;
> +
> + /* net_aligned_data.{tcp,udp}_memory_allocated was not available. */
> + memory_allocated = sk->__sk_common.skc_prot->memory_allocated->counter;
> +
> + sk_prot_ctx.memory_allocated = &memory_allocated;
> + sk_prot_ctx.memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc = memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc;
> +
> + bpf_loop(nr_cpus, drain_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc, &sk_prot_ctx, 0);
> +
> + return memory_allocated;
> +}
> +
> +static void fentry_init_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sock **sk_tracing,
> + long *memory_allocated, int *memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc,
> + bool *activated)
> +{
> + if (!*activated)
> + return;
> +
> + if (__sync_val_compare_and_swap(sk_tracing, NULL, sk))
> + return;
> +
> + *activated = false;
> + *memory_allocated = get_memory_allocated(sk, memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc);
> +}
> +
> +static void fexit_init_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sock **sk_tracing,
> + long *memory_allocated, int *memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc,
> + bool *stable)
> +{
> + long new_memory_allocated;
> +
> + if (sk != *sk_tracing)
> + return;
> +
> + new_memory_allocated = get_memory_allocated(sk, memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc);
> + if (new_memory_allocated == *memory_allocated)
> + *stable = true;
I am not sure that help. The total memory_allocated can still change after this.
I would just grab the total in fentry once and then move on without confirming
in fexit.
> +
> + *sk_tracing = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fentry/tcp_init_sock")
> +int BPF_PROG(fentry_tcp_init_sock, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + fentry_init_sock(sk, &tcp_sk_tracing,
> + &tcp_memory_allocated, &tcp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc,
> + &tcp_activated);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fexit/tcp_init_sock")
> +int BPF_PROG(fexit_tcp_init_sock, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + fexit_init_sock(sk, &tcp_sk_tracing,
> + &tcp_memory_allocated, &tcp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc,
> + &tcp_stable);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fentry/udp_init_sock")
> +int BPF_PROG(fentry_udp_init_sock, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + fentry_init_sock(sk, &udp_sk_tracing,
> + &udp_memory_allocated, &udp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc,
> + &udp_activated);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fexit/udp_init_sock")
> +int BPF_PROG(fexit_udp_init_sock, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + fexit_init_sock(sk, &udp_sk_tracing,
> + &udp_memory_allocated, &udp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc,
> + &udp_stable);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("cgroup/sock_create")
> +int sock_create(struct bpf_sock *ctx)
> +{
> + u32 flags = SK_BPF_MEMCG_EXCLUSIVE;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SK_BPF_MEMCG_FLAGS,
> + &flags, sizeof(flags));
> + if (err)
> + goto err;
> +
> + flags = 0;
> +
> + err = bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SK_BPF_MEMCG_FLAGS,
> + &flags, sizeof(flags));
> + if (err)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (flags != SK_BPF_MEMCG_EXCLUSIVE) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> +
> +err:
> + bpf_set_retval(err);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
Powered by blists - more mailing lists