[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <980e87b7-64f8-4980-83b0-e386d48af310@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:22:12 +0530
From: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+ea28e9d85be2f327b6c6@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang
<wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hans Wippel <hwippel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] smc: Fix use-after-free in
__pnet_find_base_ndev().
On 17/09/25 3:17 am, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> + dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
> + dev = dst ? dst_dev_rcu(dst) : NULL;
> + dev_hold(dev);
We should hold the reference to dev only if it's non-NULL(although
netdev_hold() has this sanity check), as we are doing the same while
releasing the reference to dev in below code:
if(dev) {
smc_pnet_find_roce_by_pnetid(dev, ini);
dev_put(dev);
}
Same applies to changes in smc_pnet_find_ism_resource().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists