[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250918162133.111922-10-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 18:21:28 +0200
From: chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com
To: pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
corbet@....net,
horms@...nel.org,
dsahern@...nel.org,
kuniyu@...zon.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dave.taht@...il.com,
jhs@...atatu.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
donald.hunter@...il.com,
ast@...erby.net,
liuhangbin@...il.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
ij@...nel.org,
ncardwell@...gle.com,
koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com,
g.white@...lelabs.com,
ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com,
mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com,
cheshire@...le.com,
rs.ietf@....at,
Jason_Livingood@...cast.com,
vidhi_goel@...le.com
Cc: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 09/14] tcp: accecn: retransmit SYN/ACK without AccECN option or non-AccECN SYN/ACK
From: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
If the TCP Server has not received an ACK to acknowledge its SYN/ACK
after the normal TCP timeout or it receives a second SYN with a
request for AccECN support, then either the SYN/ACK might just have
been lost, e.g. due to congestion, or a middlebox might be blocking
AccECN Options. To expedite connection setup in deployment scenarios
where AccECN path traversal might be problematic, the TCP Server SHOULD
retransmit the SYN/ACK, but with no AccECN Option.
If this retransmission times out, to expedite connection setup, the TCP
Server SHOULD retransmit the SYN/ACK with (AE,CWR,ECE) = (0,0,0)
and no AccECN Option, but it remains in AccECN feedback mode.
This follows Section 3.2.3.2.2 of AccECN spec (RFC9768).
Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
---
include/net/tcp_ecn.h | 14 ++++++++++----
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp_ecn.h b/include/net/tcp_ecn.h
index 7ceb191893c6..f01cac9d39c9 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp_ecn.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp_ecn.h
@@ -644,10 +644,16 @@ static inline void tcp_ecn_clear_syn(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
static inline void
tcp_ecn_make_synack(const struct request_sock *req, struct tcphdr *th)
{
- if (tcp_rsk(req)->accecn_ok)
- tcp_accecn_echo_syn_ect(th, tcp_rsk(req)->syn_ect_rcv);
- else if (inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok)
- th->ece = 1;
+ if (req->num_retrans < 1 || req->num_timeout < 1) {
+ if (tcp_rsk(req)->accecn_ok)
+ tcp_accecn_echo_syn_ect(th, tcp_rsk(req)->syn_ect_rcv);
+ else if (inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok)
+ th->ece = 1;
+ } else if (tcp_rsk(req)->accecn_ok) {
+ th->ae = 0;
+ th->cwr = 0;
+ th->ece = 0;
+ }
}
static inline bool tcp_accecn_option_beacon_check(const struct sock *sk)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index bf90c2b33af3..d4aae5dc2201 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ static unsigned int tcp_synack_options(const struct sock *sk,
if (treq->accecn_ok &&
READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_ecn_option) &&
- req->num_timeout < 1 && remaining >= TCPOLEN_ACCECN_BASE) {
+ req->num_retrans < 1 && remaining >= TCPOLEN_ACCECN_BASE) {
opts->use_synack_ecn_bytes = 1;
remaining -= tcp_options_fit_accecn(opts, 0, remaining);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists