netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/2] lantiq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250919165008.247549ab@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:50:08 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Hauke
 Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] lantiq_gswip fixes

On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:21:40 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> This is a small set of fixes which I believe should be backported for
> the lantiq_gswip driver. Daniel Golle asked me to submit them here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aLiDfrXUbw1O5Vdi@pidgin.makrotopia.org/
> 
> As mentioned there, a merge conflict with net-next is expected, due to
> the movement of the driver to the 'drivers/net/dsa/lantiq' folder there.
> Good luck :-/
> 
> Patch 2/2 fixes an old regression and is the minimal fix for that, as
> discussed here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aJfNMLNoi1VOsPrN@pidgin.makrotopia.org/
> 
> Patch 1/2 was identified by me through static analysis, and I consider
> it to be a serious deficiency. It needs a test tag.

Daniel, can we count on your for that?