[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250919170445.45803d42@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:04:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <jjc@...ark.com>
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Florian Fainelli
<florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vadim
Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, Kory Maincent
<kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Yaroslav Kolomiiets <yrk@...a.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for
ancillary features
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:33:15 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> James Clark reported off list that the broadcom PHY PTP driver was
> incorrectly handling PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST and PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST ioctls since
> the conversion to the .supported_*_flags fields. This series fixes the
> driver to correctly report its flags through the .supported_perout_flags
> and .supported_extts_flags fields. It also contains an update to comment
> the behavior of the PTP_STRICT_FLAGS being always enabled for
> PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2.
James, would you be willing to test and send an official Tested-by tag?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists