[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250922191957.2855612-1-jbaron@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:19:57 -0400
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 net] net: allow alloc_skb_with_frags() to use MAX_SKB_FRAGS
Currently, alloc_skb_with_frags() will only fill (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - 1)
slots. I think it should use all MAX_SKB_FRAGS slots, as callers of
alloc_skb_with_frags() will size their allocation of frags based
on MAX_SKB_FRAGS.
This issue was discovered via a test patch that sets 'order' to 0
in alloc_skb_with_frags(), which effectively tests/simulates high
fragmentation. In this case sendmsg() on unix sockets will fail every
time for large allocations. If the PAGE_SIZE is 4K, then data_len will
request 68K or 17 pages, but alloc_skb_with_frags() can only allocate
64K in this case or 16 pages.
Fixes: 09c2c90705bb ("net: allow alloc_skb_with_frags() to allocate bigger packets")
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
---
Changes:
v2: Add Fixes: tag
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 23b776cd9879..df942aca0617 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -6669,7 +6669,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_skb_with_frags(unsigned long header_len,
return NULL;
while (data_len) {
- if (nr_frags == MAX_SKB_FRAGS - 1)
+ if (nr_frags == MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
goto failure;
while (order && PAGE_ALIGN(data_len) < (PAGE_SIZE << order))
order--;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists