[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922100913.392916-6-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:07:35 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH net 05/10] can: sun4i_can: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to
directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check
which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that
skb->len fits the interface's MTU.
Unfortunately, because the sun4i_can driver does not populate its
net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to
configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example:
$ ip link set can0 mtu 9999
After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the
ETH_P_CANXL protocol:
socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL))
to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example:
struct canxl_frame frame = {
.flags = 0xff,
.len = 2048,
};
The CAN drivers' xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to
check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the
malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks:
1. the skb->protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the
function does not check the actual device capabilities).
2. the length is a valid CAN XL length.
And so, sun4ican_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not
able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN frame.
This can result in a buffer overflow. The driver will consume cf->len
as-is with no further checks on this line:
dlc = cf->len;
Here, cf->len corresponds to the flags field of the CAN XL frame. In
our previous example, we set canxl_frame->flags to 0xff. Because the
maximum expected length is 8, a buffer overflow of 247 bytes occurs a
couple line below when doing:
for (i = 0; i < dlc; i++)
writel(cf->data[i], priv->base + (dreg + i * 4));
Populate net_device_ops->ndo_change_mtu() to ensure that the
interface's MTU can not be set to anything bigger than CAN_MTU. By
fixing the root cause, this prevents the buffer overflow.
Fixes: 0738eff14d81 ("can: Allwinner A10/A20 CAN Controller support - Kernel module")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250918-can-fix-mtu-v1-3-0d1cada9393b@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c b/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c
index 6fcb301ef611..53bfd873de9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c
@@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops sun4ican_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_open = sun4ican_open,
.ndo_stop = sun4ican_close,
.ndo_start_xmit = sun4ican_start_xmit,
+ .ndo_change_mtu = can_change_mtu,
};
static const struct ethtool_ops sun4ican_ethtool_ops = {
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists