[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922183254.5990893d@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:32:54 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
razor@...ckwall.org, pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com,
sdf@...ichev.me, john.fastabend@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
jordan@...fe.io, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/20] net, ynl: Add peer info to queue-get
response
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 23:31:39 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> + name: peer-info
> + attributes:
> + -
> + name: id
> + doc: Queue index of the netdevice to which the peer queue belongs.
> + type: u32
> + -
> + name: ifindex
> + doc: ifindex of the netdevice to which the peer queue belongs.
> + type: u32
Oh, we have an ifindex in the local netns. So the API is to bind a
queue to one side of a netkit and then the other side of the netkit
actually gets to use it? Should we not be "binding" to the device that
is of interest rather than its peer?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists