lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922183254.5990893d@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:32:54 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 razor@...ckwall.org, pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com,
 sdf@...ichev.me, john.fastabend@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
 jordan@...fe.io, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
 David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/20] net, ynl: Add peer info to queue-get
 response

On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 23:31:39 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> +    name: peer-info
> +    attributes:
> +      -
> +        name: id
> +        doc: Queue index of the netdevice to which the peer queue belongs.
> +        type: u32
> +      -
> +        name: ifindex
> +        doc: ifindex of the netdevice to which the peer queue belongs.
> +        type: u32

Oh, we have an ifindex in the local netns. So the API is to bind a
queue to one side of a netkit and then the other side of the netkit
actually gets to use it? Should we not be "binding" to the device that
is of interest rather than its peer?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ