lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922185908.3305137e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:59:08 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 razor@...ckwall.org, pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com,
 sdf@...ichev.me, john.fastabend@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
 jordan@...fe.io, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/20] netkit: Support for io_uring zero-copy
 and AF_XDP

On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 23:31:33 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> We have implemented support for this concept in netkit and tested the
> latter against Nvidia ConnectX-6 (mlx5) as well as Broadcom BCM957504
> (bnxt_en) 100G NICs. For more details see the individual patches.

at high level

 - not sure how instance locking is going to work here
 - integration with other queue related APIs is missing (stats and
   upcoming config API)
 - the model of "allocating a queue" needs careful thought, the model
   of bumping the real num rx on the remote is fine here but it will
   not work for real HW queue alloc
 - I'd have expected more of the code to live in the core vs so much
   handling in netkit
 - we need selftests (while the sample is unnecessary)
 - last but not least - I recommend
   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250912095730.1efaac16@kernel.org/
   ;)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ