[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250925121332.848157-35-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:08:11 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 34/48] can: netlink: add can_validate_databittiming()
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
Factorise the databittiming validation out of can_validate() and move
it in the new add can_validate_databittiming() function. Also move
can_validate()'s comment because it is specific to CAN FD. This is a
preparation patch for the introduction of CAN XL as this databittiming
validation will be reused later on.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250923-canxl-netlink-prep-v4-6-e720d28f66fe@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c b/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c
index 25c08adee9ad..549a2247d847 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c
@@ -100,10 +100,13 @@ static int can_validate_tdc(struct nlattr *data_tdc,
return 0;
}
-static int can_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+static int can_validate_databittiming(struct nlattr *data[],
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ int ifla_can_data_bittiming, u32 flags)
{
- bool is_can_fd = false;
+ struct nlattr *data_tdc;
+ u32 tdc_flags;
+ bool is_on;
int err;
/* Make sure that valid CAN FD configurations always consist of
@@ -113,35 +116,56 @@ static int can_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
* - TDC parameters are coherent (details in can_validate_tdc())
*/
+ if (ifla_can_data_bittiming == IFLA_CAN_DATA_BITTIMING) {
+ data_tdc = data[IFLA_CAN_TDC];
+ tdc_flags = flags & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_TDC_MASK;
+ is_on = flags & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD;
+ } else {
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* Place holder for CAN XL */
+ }
+
+ if (is_on) {
+ if (!data[IFLA_CAN_BITTIMING] || !data[ifla_can_data_bittiming])
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (data[ifla_can_data_bittiming] || data_tdc) {
+ if (!is_on)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ err = can_validate_bittiming(data, extack, ifla_can_data_bittiming);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = can_validate_tdc(data_tdc, extack, tdc_flags);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int can_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ u32 flags = 0;
+ int err;
+
if (!data)
return 0;
if (data[IFLA_CAN_CTRLMODE]) {
struct can_ctrlmode *cm = nla_data(data[IFLA_CAN_CTRLMODE]);
- is_can_fd = cm->flags & cm->mask & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD;
-
- err = can_validate_tdc(data[IFLA_CAN_TDC], extack,
- cm->flags & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_TDC_MASK);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ flags = cm->flags & cm->mask;
}
err = can_validate_bittiming(data, extack, IFLA_CAN_BITTIMING);
if (err)
return err;
- if (is_can_fd) {
- if (!data[IFLA_CAN_BITTIMING] || !data[IFLA_CAN_DATA_BITTIMING])
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
-
- if (data[IFLA_CAN_DATA_BITTIMING] || data[IFLA_CAN_TDC]) {
- if (!is_can_fd)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
-
- err = can_validate_bittiming(data, extack, IFLA_CAN_DATA_BITTIMING);
+ err = can_validate_databittiming(data, extack,
+ IFLA_CAN_DATA_BITTIMING, flags);
if (err)
return err;
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists