netdev - [PATCH net-next 08/48] can: rcar_canfd: Simplify data bit rate config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250925121332.848157-9-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:07:45 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de,
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/48] can: rcar_canfd: Simplify data bit rate config

From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>

Introduce rcar_canfd_compute_data_bit_rate_cfg() for simplifying data bit
rate configuration by replacing function-like macros.

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250908120940.147196-5-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 99719c84f452..401505264676 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -169,15 +169,7 @@
 #define RCANFD_CERFL_ERR(x)		((x) & (0x7fff)) /* above bits 14:0 */
 
 /* RSCFDnCFDCmDCFG */
-#define RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, x)	(((x) & ((gpriv)->info->data_bittiming->sjw_max - 1)) << 24)
-
-#define RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, x) \
-	(((x) & ((gpriv)->info->data_bittiming->tseg2_max - 1)) << (gpriv)->info->sh->dtseg2)
-
-#define RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG1(gpriv, x) \
-	(((x) & ((gpriv)->info->data_bittiming->tseg1_max - 1)) << (gpriv)->info->sh->dtseg1)
-
-#define RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP(x)		(((x) & 0xff) << 0)
+#define RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP		GENMASK(7, 0)
 
 /* RSCFDnCFDCmFDCFG */
 #define RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG_CLOE		BIT(30)
@@ -1401,6 +1393,19 @@ static inline u32 rcar_canfd_compute_nominal_bit_rate_cfg(struct rcar_canfd_chan
 	return (ntseg1 | ntseg2 | nsjw | nbrp);
 }
 
+static inline u32 rcar_canfd_compute_data_bit_rate_cfg(const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info *info,
+						       u16 tseg1, u16 tseg2, u16 sjw, u16 brp)
+{
+	u32 dtseg1, dtseg2, dsjw, dbrp;
+
+	dtseg1 = (tseg1 & (info->data_bittiming->tseg1_max - 1)) << info->sh->dtseg1;
+	dtseg2 = (tseg2 & (info->data_bittiming->tseg2_max - 1)) << info->sh->dtseg2;
+	dsjw = (sjw & (info->data_bittiming->sjw_max - 1)) << 24;
+	dbrp = FIELD_PREP(RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP, brp);
+
+	return (dtseg1 | dtseg2 | dsjw | dbrp);
+}
+
 static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
 {
 	u32 mask = RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO | RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCE | RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCOC;
@@ -1430,10 +1435,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
 	sjw = dbt->sjw - 1;
 	tseg1 = dbt->prop_seg + dbt->phase_seg1 - 1;
 	tseg2 = dbt->phase_seg2 - 1;
-
-	cfg = (RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP(brp) |
-	       RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
-
+	cfg = rcar_canfd_compute_data_bit_rate_cfg(gpriv->info, tseg1, tseg2, sjw, brp);
 	writel(cfg, &gpriv->fcbase[ch].dcfg);
 
 	/* Transceiver Delay Compensation */
-- 
2.51.0