[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2a0cbdc-776a-42c8-8e19-051a12a1a7bc@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:46:30 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: "Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia)" <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"kuniyu@...zon.com" <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dave.taht@...il.com" <dave.taht@...il.com>,
"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"donald.hunter@...il.com" <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
"ast@...erby.net" <ast@...erby.net>,
"liuhangbin@...il.com" <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"ij@...nel.org" <ij@...nel.org>, "ncardwell@...gle.com"
<ncardwell@...gle.com>,
"Koen De Schepper (Nokia)" <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
"g.white@...lelabs.com" <g.white@...lelabs.com>,
"ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com" <ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com>,
"mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com" <mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com>,
"cheshire@...le.com" <cheshire@...le.com>, "rs.ietf@....at"
<rs.ietf@....at>, "Jason_Livingood@...cast.com"
<Jason_Livingood@...cast.com>, "vidhi_goel@...le.com" <vidhi_goel@...le.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 13/14] tcp: accecn: stop sending AccECN opt
when loss ACK w/ option
On 9/25/25 4:46 PM, Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote:
>From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 12:52 PM
>> On 9/18/25 6:21 PM, chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com wrote:
>>> From: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
>>>
>>> Detect spurious retransmission of a previously sent ACK carrying the
>>> AccECN option after the second retransmission. Since this might be
>>> caused by the middlebox dropping ACK with options it does not
>>> recognize, disable the sending of the AccECN option in all subsequent
>>> ACKs. This patch follows Section 3.2.3.2.2 of AccECN spec (RFC9768).
>>
>> Is this really useful/triggers in practice?
>>
>> AFAICS it will take effect only it the retransmission happens just after an egress AccECN packet, i.e. will not trigger if the there are more later non AccECN packets pending.
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> This is a simplied implementation than what is mentieond in the RFC9768:
> "Such a host detect loss of ACKs carrying the AccECN Option by detecting whether the acknowledged data alwaysreappears as a retransmission. In such cases, the host disable the sending of the AccECN Option for this half-connection."
>
> However, to implement the case that not that just after egressing the ACK with AccECN, I was thinking to modify struct tcp_sack_block but that maybe an over engineering.
I agree touching tcp_sack_block looks overkill. I think that the
simplified implementation is a bit too far from the RFC specification
and too simplistic to be effective. I suggest dropping this change.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists