[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNau1UuLdO296pJf@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:18:45 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel_team@...ynix.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, almasrymina@...gle.com,
hawk@...nel.org, toke@...hat.com, asml.silence@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with
netmem_to_nmdesc()
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 12:54:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Changes from RFC v2:
> 1. Add a Reviewed-by tag (Thanks to Mina)
> 2. Rebase on main branch as of Sep 22
>
> Changes from RFC:
> 1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
> instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
>
> --->8---
> >From 01d23fc4b20c369a2ecf29dc92319d55a4e63aa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
>
> Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
> via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
>
> Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
> netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
>
> While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
> used instead.
>
> Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Hi Byungchul,
Some process issues from my side.
1. The revision information, up to including the '--->8---' line above
should be below the scissors ('---') below.
This is so that it is available to reviewers, appears in mailing
list archives, and so on. But is not included in git history.
2. Starting the patch description with a 'From: ' line is fine.
But 'Date:" and 'Subject:' lines don't belong there.
Perhaps 1 and 2 are some sort of tooling error?
3. Unfortunately while this patch is targeted at net-next,
it doesn't apply cleanly there.
When you repost, be sure to observe the 24h rule.
Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists