[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jukftp6dcz7padxxistl6ifuqnfhsd45owv46d2l4755t7vhxa@tbpri2oxyfyp>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 18:43:03 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryan-bt.tan@...adcom.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vishnu.dasa@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, berrange@...hat.com, Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 5/9] vsock/virtio: add netns to virtio
transport common
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 04:43:49PM -0700, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>
>Add support to the virtio-vsock common code for passing around net
>namespace pointers (tx and rx). The series still requires vhost/virtio
>transport support to be added by future patches.
>
>Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>---
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 +
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>index ea955892488a..165157580cb8 100644
>--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info {
> u32 remote_cid, remote_port;
> struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> struct msghdr *msg;
>+ struct net *net;
> u32 pkt_len;
> u16 type;
> u16 op;
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index 1a9129e33d51..8a08a5103e7c 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -316,6 +316,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *
> info->flags,
> zcopy);
>
>+ virtio_vsock_skb_set_net(skb, info->net);
>+
>+ if (vsk)
>+ virtio_vsock_skb_set_orig_net_mode(skb, vsk->orig_net_mode);
If `vsk` is NULL we don't set it, is it right?
I'd add a comment to explain that, because it's not clear.
Thanks,
Stefano
>+
> return skb;
> out:
> kfree_skb(skb);
>@@ -527,6 +532,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_credit_update(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_UPDATE,
> .vsk = vsk,
>+ .net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)),
> };
>
> return virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(vsk, &info);
>@@ -1067,6 +1073,7 @@ int virtio_transport_connect(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST,
> .vsk = vsk,
>+ .net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)),
> };
>
> return virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(vsk, &info);
>@@ -1082,6 +1089,7 @@ int virtio_transport_shutdown(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int mode)
> (mode & SEND_SHUTDOWN ?
> VIRTIO_VSOCK_SHUTDOWN_SEND : 0),
> .vsk = vsk,
>+ .net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)),
> };
>
> return virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(vsk, &info);
>@@ -1108,6 +1116,7 @@ virtio_transport_stream_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> .msg = msg,
> .pkt_len = len,
> .vsk = vsk,
>+ .net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)),
> };
>
> return virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(vsk, &info);
>@@ -1145,6 +1154,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST,
> .reply = !!skb,
> .vsk = vsk,
>+ .net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)),
> };
>
> /* Send RST only if the original pkt is not a RST pkt */
>@@ -1165,6 +1175,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(const struct virtio_transport *t,
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST,
> .type = le16_to_cpu(hdr->type),
> .reply = true,
>+ .net = virtio_vsock_skb_net(skb),
> };
> struct sk_buff *reply;
>
>@@ -1465,6 +1476,7 @@ virtio_transport_send_response(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> .remote_port = le32_to_cpu(hdr->src_port),
> .reply = true,
> .vsk = vsk,
>+ .net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk)),
> };
>
> return virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(vsk, &info);
>@@ -1578,7 +1590,9 @@ static bool virtio_transport_valid_type(u16 type)
> void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
>+ enum vsock_net_mode orig_net_mode = virtio_vsock_skb_orig_net_mode(skb);
> struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
>+ struct net *net = virtio_vsock_skb_net(skb);
> struct sockaddr_vm src, dst;
> struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> struct sock *sk;
>@@ -1606,9 +1620,9 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> /* The socket must be in connected or bound table
> * otherwise send reset back
> */
>- sk = vsock_find_connected_socket(&src, &dst, vsock_global_dummy_net());
>+ sk = vsock_find_connected_socket(&src, &dst, net, orig_net_mode);
> if (!sk) {
>- sk = vsock_find_bound_socket(&dst, vsock_global_dummy_net());
>+ sk = vsock_find_bound_socket(&dst, net, orig_net_mode);
> if (!sk) {
> (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb);
> goto free_pkt;
>
>--
>2.47.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists