netdev - Re: [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250926180625.14d51c69@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 18:06:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nicolas Ferre
 <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Harini Katakam
 <harini.katakam@...inx.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Sean Anderson
 <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes

On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:00:22 +0200 Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Pending series on MACB are: (1) many cleanup patches, (2) patches for
> EyeQ5 support and (3) XDP work. Those will be sent targeting
> net-next/main once this series lands there, aiming to minimise merge
> conflicts. Old version of(1) and (2) are visible in the V2 revision [0].

Slightly worried this will regress some platforms with less memory.
I suppose this device is mostly used on systems with <4GB of DRAM
so the upper 32b register thing doesn't matter at all. But less DRAM
the more problematic it may be to perform the large allocations.

I guess we'll find out..