[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNqXETgt9pHIsnvx@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:26:25 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Revert "net: group sk_backlog and
sk_receive_queue"
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:08:39PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This reverts commit 4effb335b5dab08cb6e2c38d038910f8b527cfc9.
>
> This was a benefit for UDP flood case, which was later greatly improved
> with commits 6471658dc66c ("udp: use skb_attempt_defer_free()")
> and b650bf0977d3 ("udp: remove busylock and add per NUMA queues").
>
> Apparently blamed commit added a regression for RAW sockets, possibly
> because they do not use the dual RX queue strategy that UDP has.
>
> sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason() and RAW recvmsg() compete for sk_receive_buf
> and sk_rmem_alloc changes, and them being in the same
> cache line reduce performance.
>
> Fixes: 4effb335b5da ("net: group sk_backlog and sk_receive_queue")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202509281326.f605b4eb-lkp@intel.com
> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/net/sock.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Sorry Eric, but it looks like you forgot your SoB.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists