[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250929074840.GA19203@system.software.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:48:40 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel_team@...ynix.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, almasrymina@...gle.com,
hawk@...nel.org, toke@...hat.com, asml.silence@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with
netmem_to_nmdesc()
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 10:46:19AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 12:54:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Changes from RFC v2:
> > > 1. Add a Reviewed-by tag (Thanks to Mina)
> > > 2. Rebase on main branch as of Sep 22
> > >
> > > Changes from RFC:
> > > 1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
> > > instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
> > >
> > > --->8---
> > > >From 01d23fc4b20c369a2ecf29dc92319d55a4e63aa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> > > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
> > > Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
> > >
> > > Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
> > > via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
> > >
> > > Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
> > > netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
> > >
> > > While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
> > > used instead.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> >
> > Hi Byungchul,
> >
> > Some process issues from my side.
> >
> > 1. The revision information, up to including the '--->8---' line above
> > should be below the scissors ('---') below.
> >
> > This is so that it is available to reviewers, appears in mailing
> > list archives, and so on. But is not included in git history.
>
> Ah yes. Thank you. Lemme check.
>
> > 2. Starting the patch description with a 'From: ' line is fine.
> > But 'Date:" and 'Subject:' lines don't belong there.
> >
> > Perhaps 1 and 2 are some sort of tooling error?
> >
> > 3. Unfortunately while this patch is targeted at net-next,
> > it doesn't apply cleanly there.
>
> I don't understand why. Now I just rebased on the latest 'main' and it
> works well. What should I check else?
I think 1 and 2 ends in 3. I will fix it and resend it after the merge
window.
Byungchul
> > When you repost, be sure to observe the 24h rule.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Byungchul
>
> > Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
> >
> > --
> > pw-bot: changes-requested
> >
> > ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists