lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250929103558.000033bf@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:35:58 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "Len
 Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko
	<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Javier Carrasco
	<javier.carrasco@...fvision.net>, Dmitry Torokhov
	<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek
	<pavel@...nel.org>, Matthias Fend <matthias.fend@...end.at>, Chanwoo Choi
	<cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "Laurent
 Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Paul Elder
	<paul.elder@...asonboard.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub
 Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Mark Brown
	<broonie@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar
	<mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] ACPI: property: Return present device nodes
 only on fwnode interface

On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 10:45:50 +0300
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> fwnode_graph_get_next_subnode() may return fwnode backed by ACPI device
> nodes and there has been no check these devices are present in the system,
> unlike there has been on fwnode OF backend. In order to provide consistent
> behaviour towards callers, add a check for device presence by introducing
> a new function acpi_get_next_present_subnode(), used as the
> get_next_child_node() fwnode operation that also checks device node
> presence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>

I think this is fine because of the bit in the ACPI spec that says all
bits are set if _STA is missing.   It seems much less likely we'll see
problems with hardware disappearing because _STA is there but says
the device isn't present.

Always a regression risk though :(

With the formatting changes Laurent asked for
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ