[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aN4zzDvdJKjRxdnt@strlen.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 10:11:56 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 nf-next 2/3] netfilter: bridge: Add conntrack double
vlan and pppoe
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com> wrote:
> This adds the capability to conntrack 802.1ad, QinQ, PPPoE and PPPoE-in-Q
> packets that are passing a bridge, only when a conntrack zone is set.
I got no more comments for the patch itself, but this commit message
needs more information.
Why are you adding this?
Why the conntrack zone constraint?
Also, I don't think this conntracks 802.1ad etc. at all, it tracks
connections carried inside these L2 encapsulations rather than
just plain ip(v6) in ethernet.
... and again, why would one do that, i.e. whats the purpose of this
patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists