[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aOEQu2fgvx1GlrAA@strlen.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 14:19:07 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 nf-next] selftests: netfilter: Add
bridge_fastpath.sh
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com> wrote:
> Changes in the patchset "conntrack: bridge: add double vlan, pppoe and
> pppoe-in-q" has lead to changes in this script. I'm waiting for that
> patch-set is to be accepted. Then I will send this script without the
> rfc tag.
Can you send this script standalone? You can extend it along with the
feature patches.
> > Its a pre-existing bug, br_vlan_fill_forward_path_pvid uses
> > br_vlan_group() instead of _rcu version.
> >
> > Will you send a patch for this?
> I had this as part of an upcoming patch-set, but I will remove it from
> there and send it as a separate patch. I assume this can go to nf
> instead of nf-next, as it is a bugfix?
Yes, standalone fix for nf, with "Fies" tag pointing at the patch
that introduced this bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists