[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fcd97ca7-f293-49ce-bf01-3ba0001a7753@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:37:43 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 5/5] net: dev_queue_xmit() llist adoption
Hi,
On 10/6/25 9:31 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
> index 31561291bc92fd70d4d3ca8f5f7dbc4c94c895a0..94966692ccdf51db085c236319705aecba8c30cf 100644
> --- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
> +++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
> @@ -115,7 +115,9 @@ struct Qdisc {
> struct Qdisc *next_sched;
> struct sk_buff_head skb_bad_txq;
>
> - spinlock_t busylock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> + atomic_long_t defer_count ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> + struct llist_head defer_list;
> +
Dumb question: I guess the above brings back Qdisc to the original size
? (pre patch 4/5?) If so, perhaps is worth mentioning somewhere in the
commit message.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists