lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c42a5a4a-b886-4dbd-a893-3d1f2885ef4f@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 16:20:53 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: 'Simon Horman' <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	'Andrew Lunn' <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"'David S. Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	'Eric Dumazet' <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	'Jakub Kicinski' <kuba@...nel.org>,
	'Paolo Abeni' <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"'Russell King (Oracle)'" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
	'Mengyuan Lou' <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: txgbe: expend SW-FW mailbox buffer
 size to identify QSFP module

> The old firmware has not been released to the public, so there is no need
> to worry about the compatibility on the old firmware.

Please add this to the commit message.

Once firmware is out in the wild, you need to consider backwards
compatibility. As reviewers, it is something we look at. So you can
save us time and effort by saying backwards compatibility is not
required because ...

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ