netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/3] rculist: Add hlist_nulls_replace_rcu() and hlist_nulls_replace_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <71de19ef-6f63-47f5-b5ed-9eaef932439c@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 15:04:34 +0800
From: luoxuanqiang <xuanqiang.luo@...ux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>,
 Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, horms@...nel.org, kuniyu@...gle.com,
 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>,
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/3] rculist: Add hlist_nulls_replace_rcu()
 and hlist_nulls_replace_init_rcu()

在 2025/10/13 14:26, Jason Xing 写道:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 1:36 PM Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:16:00AM +0800, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>> On 9/26/25 9:40 AM, xuanqiang.luo@...ux.dev wrote:
>>>> From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
>>>>
>>>> Add two functions to atomically replace RCU-protected hlist_nulls entries.
>> [...]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
>>> This deserves explicit ack from RCU maintainers.
>>>
>>> Since we are finalizing the net-next PR, I suggest to defer this series
>>> to the next cycle, to avoid rushing such request.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Paolo
>> Hi maintainers,
>>
>> This patch was previously held off due to the merge window.
>>
>> Now that the merge net-next has open and no further changes are required,
>> could we please consider merging it directly?
>>
>> Apologies for the slight push, but I'm hoping we can get a formal
>> commit backported to our production branch.
> I suppose a new version that needs to be rebased is necessary.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason

I’ve rebased the series of patches onto the latest codebase locally and
didn’t encounter any errors.

If there’s anything else I can do to help get these patches merged, just
let me know.

Thanks!