[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176040424399.3390136.8061166550868756938.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 01:10:43 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, clrkwllms@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
syzbot+8715dd783e9b0bef43b1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: gro_cells: Use nested-BH locking for gro_cell
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 11:43:38 +0200 you wrote:
> The gro_cell data structure is per-CPU variable and relies on disabled
> BH for its locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on
> PREEMPT_RT this data structure requires explicit locking.
>
> Add a local_lock_t to the data structure and use
> local_lock_nested_bh() for locking. This change adds only lockdep
> coverage and does not alter the functional behaviour for !PREEMPT_RT.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: gro_cells: Use nested-BH locking for gro_cell
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/25718fdcbdd2
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists