[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251014171907.3554413-3-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:19:03 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: add add indirect call wrapper in skb_release_head_state()
While stress testing UDP senders on a host with expensive indirect
calls, I found cpus processing TX completions where showing
a very high cost (20%) in sock_wfree() due to
CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=y.
Take care of TCP and UDP TX destructors and use INDIRECT_CALL_3() macro.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index bc12790017b0..692e3a70e75e 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1136,7 +1136,16 @@ void skb_release_head_state(struct sk_buff *skb)
skb_dst_drop(skb);
if (skb->destructor) {
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
- skb->destructor(skb);
+#ifdef CONFIG_INET
+ INDIRECT_CALL_3(skb->destructor,
+ tcp_wfree, __sock_wfree, sock_wfree,
+ skb);
+#else
+ INDIRECT_CALL_1(skb->destructor,
+ sock_wfree,
+ skb);
+
+#endif
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK)
nf_conntrack_put(skb_nfct(skb));
--
2.51.0.788.g6d19910ace-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists