[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v7kgfujx.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:17:22 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: add add indirect call wrapper in
skb_release_head_state()
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> writes:
> While stress testing UDP senders on a host with expensive indirect
> calls, I found cpus processing TX completions where showing
> a very high cost (20%) in sock_wfree() due to
> CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=y.
>
> Take care of TCP and UDP TX destructors and use INDIRECT_CALL_3() macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists