netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] cxgb4: convert to ndo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aPCoekdo1PwB9Upm@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:10:34 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Cc: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Egor Pomozov <epomozov@...vell.com>,
	Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
	Dimitris Michailidis <dmichail@...gible.com>,
	MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] cxgb4: convert to ndo_hwtstamp API

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 09:05:16PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 15.10.2025 15:37, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 11:33:02AM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > > On 15/10/2025 11:05, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 10:42:14PM +0000, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > > > > Convert to use .ndo_hwtstamp_get()/.ndo_hwtstamp_set() callbacks.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Though I'm not quite sure it worked properly before the conversion.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Vadim,
> > > > 
> > > > There is quite a lot of change here. Probably it's not worth "fixing"
> > > > the current code before migrating it. But I think it would be worth
> > > > expanding a bit on the statement about not being sure it worked?
> > > 
> > > Hi Simon!
> > > 
> > > Well, let me try to explain the statement about not being sure it
> > > worked. The original code was copying new configuration into netdev's
> > > private structure before validating that the values are acceptable by
> > > the hardware. In case of error, the driver was not restoring original
> > > values, and after the call:
> > > 
> > > ioctl(SIOCSHWTSTAMP, <unsupported_config>) = -ERANGE
> > > 
> > > the driver would have configuration which could not be reapplied and not
> > > synced to the actual hardware config:
> > > 
> > > ioctl(SIOCGHWTSTAMP) = <unsupported_config>
> > > 
> > > The logic change in the patch is to just keep original configuration in
> > > case of -ERANGE error. Otherwise the logic is not changed.
> > 
> > Thanks Vadim,
> > 
> > I see that now and it makes sense to me.
> > I do think it would be worth mentioning in the patch description.
> 
> Fair point, I'll update commit message for v3.

Thanks, much appreciated.