[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34dc4a3b-51b5-400d-90e7-680c2f1dd585@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 13:26:59 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: David Wilder <wilder@...ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jv@...sburgh.net, pradeep@...ibm.com, i.maximets@....org,
amorenoz@...hat.com, haliu@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
horms@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v13 4/7] bonding: Processing extended
arp_ip_target from user space.
On 10/14/25 1:52 AM, David Wilder wrote:
> @@ -31,8 +32,10 @@ static int bond_option_use_carrier_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> static int bond_option_arp_interval_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> -static int bond_option_arp_ip_target_add(struct bonding *bond, __be32 target);
> -static int bond_option_arp_ip_target_rem(struct bonding *bond, __be32 target);
> +static int bond_option_arp_ip_target_add(struct bonding *bond,
> + struct bond_arp_target target);
I guess you passed the 'target' by value instead of using a 'const
struct bond_arp_target *' argument to reduce the code delta?
I think it would be clear the other option, it will make the intent clear.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists